by juzluu » Tue Mar 09, 2010 4:25 am
The other difference between you and me is, I read about this a lot more than you do, and frankly know more than you do about it. And like me, you're stubborn, so you won't admit it! Sorry, but working in a business and employing people doesn't qualify you to solve the centuries old dilemna regarding the role of the state as it relates to business. The fact that you don't bother dealing with a single point, and probably didn't bother reading it, tells me about as much as I need to know. Being a condescending prick and telling me to study economics has no actual bearing on this conversation, although I realize it's the only way you know how to speak, so I shouldn't get too upset about it. If you'd actually read what I wrote, you'd realize I both said that healthcare is a clusterfuck, and that premiums are increasing. I'll throw out some random terms too, since you decided to in order to try and look smart: I know what large number theory is, can you explain with anything resembling a specific why the current proposed bill is better than risk pooling? I know you probably can't, but I figured I'd end up with a question, so my post wasn't entirely pointless. Dave was asking for a discussion, and I honestly tried. It says something about a person in a political discussion when they can't even offer real facts or positions, just superioirity and the claim that the other person wouldn't understand.
Playoffs? Are you kidding me? We're talking about the playoffs? I hope we can win a game! Playoffs?